"Coca-Cola Injustice.4t.com"
If The Coca-Cola Company is your employer BEWARE!!!!!
- This is why I filed a discrimination lawsuit.
- This is why I was forced to file a retaliation lawsuit.
- This is why I was forced to file a lawsuit against Liberty Mutual.
- http://libertymutualinjustice.4t.com (The Coca-Cola Co. disability carrier)
If The Coca-Cola Company is the sponsor for your employee benefits... BEWARE!
The Coca-Cola Company upholds its decision(s) steming from illegal tactics, which are being used to steal disability benefits from a seventeen year employee, with a severe medical condition... BEWARE!
The Coca-Cola Company told lies in the Fulton County District Court of law, in the pending retaliation lawsuit.
Jacqueline Everson v. The Coca-Cola Company Civil case no. 1-05-CV-2301-RWS - USCA No: 06-15752-HH
I am Jacqueline Everson, and I became disabled while working as a senior financial analyst. I had seventeen years of employment with my last employer, The Coca-Cola Company. My entire employment with The Coca-Cola Company was spent in The McDonalds Group (TMG). I was a financial subject matter expert, and had a very good work record. I paid a premium to The Coca-Cola Company for long-term disability insurance.
The Coca-Cola Company attacked me personally, because I asked to be treated fair, and complained about being treated unfair. I filed a discrimination lawsuit before I became a disabled employee. The Coca-Cola Company retaliated against me after I became disabled, and under continuous medical care. The Coca-Cola Company deliberately (wrongfully) terminated my medical insurance while I was eligible, an in need of medical care. The Coca-Cola Company would not answer any of my urgent complaints. The Coca-Cola Company denied me severance pay after seventeen years of good employment.
I had this website created because I believe you have a right to know about The Coca-Cola Company's illegal activity, dishonesty, deceitful tactics, and lack of integrity which gives this employer an...(F) in civil rights!
CAN YOU AFFORD TO FIGHT A DISHONEST EMPLOYER IN COURT, FOR YEARS TO GET JUSTICE?
- YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS SHOULD KNOW THEY COULD LOSE EVERYTHING, IF THEY DEPEND ON THE COCA-COLA COMPANY TO STAND ON INTEGRITY AND JUSTICE!
The Coca-Cola Company's own Benefit Analyst documented that Liberty Mutual lied to her regarding my disability claim, and she in fact had proof. Quote "At this point even I was confused" "This communication conflict is a valid concern".
http://libertymutualinjustice.4t.com (see history page for medical detail)
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY "SPONSORS" BENEFITS TO THEIR EMPLOYEES, BUT TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THOSE BENEFITS ARE PROVIDED TO ITS EMPLOYEES IN A MANNER THAT REPRESENTS HONESTY, INTEGRITY, AND WITH RESPECT FOR ITS EMPLOYEES?
- THE COCA-COLA COMPANY EVADES PAYING CLAIMS WHEN LIBERTY MUTUAL (THEIR DISABILITY CARRIER) TERMINATES CLAIMS BY ANY DECEITFUL MEANS POSSIBLE, AND THE COCA-COLA COMPANY DELIBERATELY TURNS A BLIND EYE, AFTER BEING NOTIFIED.
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY IS THE "REAL" BENEFIT RECIPIENT WHEN EMPLOYEES WITH LEGITIMATE DISABILITY CLAIMS ARE TERMINATED DISHONESTLY!
- The Coca-Cola Company paid: 64.40 percent - Liberty Mutual paid: 5.60 percent. (70% total disability payment)
- The Coca-Cola Company paid (free of charge) to disabled employees:
supplemental medicare insurance, Life Insurance, and continued pension contributions.
- The Coca-Cola Company knows Liberty Mutual used a nurse to dispute my disability claim, overruling two of their own Consulting Physicians, and my treating physician.
- The Coca-Cola Company knows Liberty Mutual chose to accept the opinion of an Insurance Medical Examiner (IME) to terminate my disability insurance, and the (IME) doctor was found to be a liar, by the District Court Judge of Fulton County.
- The Coca-Cola Company knows the IME doctor was found to stand alone in minimizing my condition out of seven doctors, by the District Court Judge of Fulton County.
- The Coca-Cola Company knows the IME doctor was found to be belied by all other medical evidence in the file, by the District Court Judge of Fulton County.
Isaiah 59: 1 - 29
OCTOBER 2007: (Last Update)
RETALIATION LAWSUIT UPDATE:
Jacqueline Everson vs. The Coca-Cola Company USCA No: 06-15752-HH
I Appealed to the U.S. Court of appeals because of Judge Richard W. Story’s partial judgment, the Judge's personal knowledge of the causation in this case, and the evidence. (Fulton County District Court Judge).
- I have been Granted a Rehearing Enbanc by the U.S. Appeals Court, and I am waiting for the ruling.
The Judge tried to help The Coca-Cola Company, he allowed them to tell numerous lies to the court without punishment, and was partial against the evidence. Judge Richard W. Story denied me summary judgment because he said I did not prove the third prong (causation), even though he had personal knowledge I was engaged in a protected activity less than one month before being terminated (causation).
I am currently fighting The Coca-Cola Company in a legal battle for "retaliation" for filing a discrimination lawsuit. I became disabled in August 2003, and became a disabled employee. I was in a discrimination lawsuit (protected activity) against Coca-Cola when I became disabled.
(SEE HISTORY PAGE ON THIS WEBSITE FOR DETAILS ON DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT)
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LIES TO THE FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA DISTRICT COURT, IN RETALIATION LAWSUIT:
1. Court documents show: "The Coca-Cola Company stated that I was continuously employed by Coca-Cola until March 31, 2005".
- Court documents prove I was terminated on February 3, 2005 and March 30, 2005
- March 28, 2005, My Fax document to The Coca-Cola Company, after I did not receive any responses from my complaints. Court documents show - Quote:
"I need my medical insurance benefits urgently today. Please call me to confirm today. I need medication today. I contacted the benefit manager in The McDonalds Group on Monday, February 28, 2005 and again on March 4, 2005. I spoke to her about the unfair treatment I have received from the company's long term disability carrier, and that I just want to be treated fair. I was told my medical benefits and status would be corrected. I have been without medical insurance since 03/2/2005 and this is unreasonable. I received a letter terminating my job and benefits unjustly while I was still eligible for LTD benefits. I don't believe this level of service is acceptable for any company."
Court documents show my manager advised Liberty Mutual that I had filed a discrmination lawsuit against The Coca-Cola Company, and expressed hostility against me ("unrelated complications regarding return to work options").
Court documents show The Coca-Cola Company’s own Benefit Coordinator documented how my claim was Profiled; Benefit Coordinator's Quote!
“Subject RE: J. Everson – I am talking with Liberty Mutual to get updated communications on this one (and flowers). FYI, I am going to work with them to audit everything they’ve done since 1/1/03 to make sure no other similar cases sneak out”.
COURT DOCUMENTED ACTS OF RETALIATION (ON DISABLED WOMAN):
- The Coca-Cola Company terminated my employment in retaliation for filing a discrimination lawsuit.
- The Coca-Cola Company terminated my employment while I was engaged in a (protected activity) discrimination lawsuit.
- The Coca-Cola Company could not terminate my employment, while I was receiving disability benefits from Liberty Mutual.
- The Coca-Cola Company informed Liberty Mutual I was engaged in a discrimination lawsuit against them, and expressed hostility towards me.
- The Coca-Cola Company obtained my disability medical file from Liberty Mutual illegally (without written authorization or a subpoena).
- The Coca-Cola Company terminated my medical insurance and other benefits while I was still eligible, and in need of medical treatment.
- The Coca-Cola Company terminated my employment on two separate occasions without reinstating my employment or benefits (February 3, 2005 and March 30, 2005).
- The Coca-Cola Company discussed my personal annual employment performance reviews with Liberty Mutual (Confidential Information).
- The Coca-Cola Company did not respond to complaints of unfair treatment regarding my employment and benefits.
Note: I personally notified The Coca-Cola Company's President, and Vice President, The McDonalds Group regarding Judge Richard W. Story's comments on Liberty Mutual's IME doctor who was used to terminate my disability benefits. The Coca-Cola Company did not respond.
District Court Judge made these statements:
“Plaintiff was examined by Dr. Ralph D’Auria, an orthopedic surgeon hired by Liberty. According to Plaintiff’s undisputed statements, Dr. D’Auria spent approximately fifteen minutes examining Plaintiff.”-
“Plaintiff’s treating doctor, Dr. Stewart – who observed Plaintiff most frequently and over the longest period of time-steadily maintained that Plaintiff’s condition rendered her “100% disabled.”
“In addition, Dr. Washington’s interpretation of the EMG she performed in November 2004, which was offered shortly before Liberty terminated Plaintiff’s benefits, bolsters Plaintiff’s claim of disability.”
“Dr. D’Auria’s opinion, which virtually stands alone in its minimization of the severity of Plaintiff’s condition among the seven doctors with whom Plaintiff visited, is subject to questioning in at least several respects.“
“Indeed, several inconsistencies in Dr. D’Auria’s (IME doctor) report convince this Court that it cannot be said to be more objectively reliable as a matter of law than the other medical evidence in the record."
"Dr. D’Auria’s conclusion that Plaintiff was improving and would regain her normal strength and normal function within three to four months is simply belied by virtually all other evidence in the record.”
“In light of Liberty’s inherent conflict-of-interest, the Court cannot conclude that its reliance on Dr. D’Auria’s opinion over that of Drs. Stewart and Washington was objectively reasonable as a matter of law."
I have been diagnosed with a severe spinal cord disease and spinal nerve root disease. Social Security Administration found me to be disabled, August 29, 2003. My medical condition has progressively deteriorated since the onset of my disability, August 29, 2003.
DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL TEST(S) CONFIRM:
MYELOMALCIA AND MYELORADICULOPATHY (SPINAL CORD DISEASE AND SPINAL NERVE ROOT DISEASE)
http://libertymutualinjustice.4t.com (REVIEW HISTORY PAGE FOR MEDICAL DETAILS)
Psalm 37:1-40
PARTNERS IN CRIME!
